Explore: Fiscal, Service, and Staff Considerations in a Shared Arrangement

This comparison tool helps multiple jurisdictions compare the fiscal, service and staffing implications of providing a public health service within their own jurisdiction versus in a shared arrangement.

Available online: http://phsharing.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/B-Comparison-tool-fiscal-service-and-staff-implications.xlsx

It is included in the CJS Resource Library under the categories listed below. Select a link to find other resources in that category.

  • Accreditation / Essential Services: Explores the services each health department within a potential shared services arrangement offers and several related variables (e.g., cost, population served, etc.)
  • Change Management: Allows health departments to explore the services they provide, gaps in services, and services offered by other local health departments in their area.

 
This resource is also linked to the Roadmap. Select a link below to read more about each area.

  • Why? / Phase One: Allows health departments to identify gaps in services that might be filled by sharing services with other local health departments in their area.
  • What? / Phase One: Allows health departments to identify key services that could be shared and the different elements involved (e.g., cost, population served).
  • Who? / Phase One: Allows health departments to explore which partners might best offer or receive a particular service through a shared services arrangement.
  • Change Management / Phase Two: Allows health departments to explore the services they provide, gaps in services, and services offered by other local health departments in their area